Bombay High Court
SUNIL BALU PALAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed To be withdrawn
Holding
The Court held that the petitioner may withdraw the petition and is granted liberty to pursue an alternate remedy.
Summary
The petitioner, Sunil Balu Pala, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief. The petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition, invoking the Supreme Court’s guidance in M. Subramaniam & Anr. v. S. Janaki & Anr. (2020) 16 SCC 728, which allows withdrawal with liberty to pursue an alternate remedy. The primary issue was whether the court could grant such leave to withdraw. The bench, after considering the precedent, granted the petitioner's request, providing liberty to avail an alternate remedy. Consequently, the petition was formally withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition and be granted liberty to pursue an alternate remedy as per Supreme Court precedent?
Subjects
- withdrawal of petition
- alternate remedy
- writ petition
- Bombay High Court
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
sns 5-wp-4975-2025+.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4975 OF 2025
Sunil Balu Pala … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Amit A. Katarnware a/w. Adv.Aditya A. Katarnware for the Petitioner.
Mr. Ajay Patil, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 7th September, 2026
P.C.:-
1) Learned Advocate for the Petitioner on instructions seeks leave
to withdraw Petition with liberty to avail alternate remedy as enunciated by
the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M. Subramaniam & Anr. vs. S.
Janaki & Anr. reported in (2020) 16 SCC 728.
1.1) Leave and liberty granted.
2) Disposed off as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Checking your session…