Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRAMILA AJITKUMAR JADHAV ALIAS PRAMILA LAXMAN PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court directed Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 to submit the proposal within four weeks, thereby disposing of the petition.

Summary

Petitioner Pramila Ajitkumar Jadhav sought appointment as Shikshan Sevak and filed a writ petition alleging that Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 had failed to forward her proposal to the Deputy Director of Education. The respondents argued that they would submit the proposal within four weeks. The Court examined the limited grievance of inaction and, relying on the respondents' undertaking, ordered that the proposal be filed within four weeks from the date of the order. Consequently, the petition was disposed of with a specific direction to the respondents. No substantive discussion on statutory provisions or precedent was required.

Issues considered

  • Whether Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 are required to submit the petitioner’s proposal for appointment as Shikshan Sevak within a stipulated period?

Subjects

  • Shikshan Sevak
  • appointment
  • writ petition
  • administrative direction
  • disposal of petition

Judgment

2026:BHC-KOL:9292-DB

                                                                              46-WP-505-2026.doc


                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 505 OF 2026

               Pramila Ajitkumar Jadhav @ Pramila Laxman Patil               ...Petitioner
                         Versus
               The State Of Maharashtra And Ors.                             ...Respondents
                                                 ——————
               Mr. Rahul Rane i/b Adv. S.A.Rajeshirke, for the Petitioner.
               Mr. S.B.Kalel, AGP for the Respondent-State.
               Mr. Shubham Vasekar, for the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5.
                                                 ——————
                                                   Coram :      SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH &
                                                                NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.
                                                   Date      : SEPTEMBER 28, 2026
               P. C. :

               1.        Learned counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5, on instructions,

               submits that within a period of four weeks, proposal will be submitted

               to the Deputy Director of Education.

               2.        The limited grievance in the present Petition was inaction on part

               of Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 to submit the proposal of the Petitioner for

               appointment as Shikshan Sevak. In view of the submission made on

               behalf of learned counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5, the Petition

               stands disposed of with direction to Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 to submit

               the proposal within a period of four weeks from today.




                [NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.]                         [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]


               Arya Chavan                          1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.