Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SIDDHI SIDDHARTH KAMATversusSTATE OF GOA THR THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 ORS

Disposal
Withdrawn

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn because the relief sought has been granted.

Summary

The petitioner, Siddhi Siddharth Kamat, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa seeking payment of a due amount from the Provident Fund. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the claimed amount had been released to the petitioner. Consequently, the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and noted that the relief sought had been fully satisfied. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.

Subjects

  • Provident Fund
  • Writ Petition
  • Withdrawal of Petition
  • High Court
  • Civil Procedure

Judgment

   2026:BHC-GOA:1893-DB
                                                             24 WP 515 2025

                              Esha

                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
                                               WRIT PETITION NO.515 OF 2025

                        SIDDHI SIDDHARTH KAMAT                                     ... PETITIONER
                          Versus
                        STATE OF GOA THR THE CHIEF
                        SECRETARY AND 2 ORS                                        ... RESPONDENTS


                        Mr. Eeshan Usapkar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
                        Mr. Deep D. Shirodkar, Additional Government Advocate h/f
                        Ms. Maria Simone J. Correia, Additional Government Advocate
                        for Respondent Nos.1 and 3.
                        Mr. Prayash Shirodkar, Advocate for Respondent No. 2.


                                                CORAM:- VALMIKI MENEZES &
                                                        AMIT S. JAMSANDEKAR, JJ.
                                                DATED :- 22nd September, 2026

                        P.C:
                                  The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that since the
                        payment due towards provident fund claimed by the Petitioner has
                        now been released to the Petitioner, the relief sought has been
                        worked out. In this view of the matter, he, on instructions, seeks
                        leave to withdraw the Petition.


                        2.        The Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.



                          AMIT S. JAMSANDEKAR, J.                       VALMIKI MENEZES, J.


Signed by: VAIGANKAR ESHA
SAINATH
                                                                Page 1 of 1
Designation: Personal Assistant
Date: 24/09/2026 10:29:10                                   22nd September, 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.