Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DHANANJAY MACHHINDRA NAGANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Education Officer must examine the committee's inquiry report and, if warranted, suspend the grant-in-aid to the school.

Summary

The petitioner, Dhananjay Machhindra Nagane, filed a writ petition seeking enforcement of a committee's inquiry report dated 30 March 2021, which recommended suspension of the grant-in-aid to a school. The petitioner alleged that despite the report, the Education Officer had taken no action. The High Court examined whether the Education Officer was bound to act on the committee's recommendations. The Court held that the Education Officer must examine the report and, if it finds any ground for action, must implement the suspension of the grant-in-aid. Accordingly, the petition was disposed with a directive to the Education Officer to review the report and take appropriate action.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Education Officer is obligated to implement the committee's recommendation to suspend the grant-in-aid to the school.
  • Whether the writ petition seeking such implementation is maintainable.

Subjects

  • grant-in-aid
  • education
  • suspension
  • committee report
  • writ petition
  • administrative law
  • implementation

Judgment

2026:BHC-KOL:8756-DB

                                                                        24-WP-5177-2024.doc


                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                    WRIT PETITION NO. 5177 OF 2024
               Dhananjay Machhindra Nagane                              ...Petitioner
                         Versus
               The State Of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary And Ors       ...Respondents
                                                ——————
               Mr. Ketan Pote a/w Ms. Surekha Kamble i/b Mr. Arvind Ambetkar, for the
               Petitioner.
               Mr. Manoj Bagal (through VC), for the Respondent Nos. 4 to 6.
               Mr. A.P.Vanarase, AGP for the Respondent-State.
                                                ——————
                                                  Coram :    SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH &
                                                             NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.
                                                  Date     : SEPTEMBER 10, 2026
               P. C. :

               1.        By the present Petition, the Petitioner seeks implementation of

               the committee’s inquiry report dated 30th March, 2021 directing the

               Education Officer to suspend the grant-in-aid to the school and to take

               into consideration the grievances of the Petitioner and other

               administration. The grievance is that despite the report of the

               committee, no action has been taken by the Education Officer.

               2.        The Petition is disposed of by directing the Education Officer to

               examine the inquiry report dated 30 th March, 2021, and in the event, it is

               found that any action is required to be initiated, the same to be done.



                [NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.]                       [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]



               Arya Chavan                        1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.