Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ALKA KRISHNARAO CHOUGALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that the prayer for a stay of the reinstatement order is rejected.

Summary

Dr. Alka Krishnarao Chougale filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking reinstatement by the State of Maharashtra. The State, through its Additional Government Pleader, prayed for a stay of the order directing reinstatement, alleging complications that required additional time. The Court examined the observations in the original order and the surrounding facts. It concluded that the State had not demonstrated sufficient cause to merit a stay. Consequently, the prayer for a stay was rejected.

Issues considered

  • Whether the order directing the State to reinstate the petitioner should be stayed pending resolution of alleged complications

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • stay order
  • reinstatement
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                            901 WP 5179-26-C-SECOND ORDER.DOC




                                                                                   Priya Soparkar

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                      WRIT PETITION NO. 5179 OF 2026
                      Dr. Alka Krishnarao Chougale                               …Petitioner
                            Versus
                      The State of Maharashtra and ors.                      …Respondents


                      Ms. Vaishali K. Jagdale with Mr. Yash K. Jagdale, for the Petitioner.
                      Mr. B.V. Samant, Addl. GP, for the Respondents.


                                           CORAM:       SUMAN SHYAM &
                                                        ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ.
                                           DATED:       19th AUGUST 2026.
                      PC:-

                      1.     Mr. B. V. Samant, learned Add. GP appearing for the State

                      prayed for staying the order on the ground that due to certain

                      complications some more time will be required for the Department

                      to reinstate the Petitioner. However, considering the observations

                      made in the order and in the facts and circumstances of the case,

                      the prayer of the learned Addl. GP stands rejected.



                      (ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.)                           (SUMAN SHYAM, J.)
                                                                                                {




         Digitally
         signed by
         PRIYA
PRIYA    RAJESH
RAJESH   SOPARKAR
SOPARKAR Date:
         2026.08.19
         18:22:32
         +0530




                                                     Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.