Bombay High Court
SAKHARAM MUNJAJI DUDHATE AND ANOTHERversusDINANATH DHONDIBA DUDHATE
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is dismissed as there is no surviving issue following the final decision in the regular civil suit.
Summary
The petitioners, Sakharm Munjaji Dudhate and another, filed a writ petition challenging a judgment dated 28 June 2018 passed by the Ad‑hoc District Judge, Parbhani in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No.20/2017. The petitioners argued that the substantive dispute had already been finally decided in Regular Civil Suit No.67/2016 by a judgment dated 17 April 2023. The Court examined whether any issue remained for adjudication after the final decision in the regular suit. Finding that the regular suit had conclusively resolved the matter, the Court held that there was nothing left to entertain in the present petition. Consequently, the petition was disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition remains maintainable after the substantive civil suit has been finally decided
Subjects
- writ petition
- civil appeal
- res judicata
- petition dismissed
- jurisdiction
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38813
5183.19WP
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
905 WRIT PETITION NO.5183 OF 2019
SAKHARAM MUNJAJI DUDHATE & ANOTHER
VERSUS
DINANATH DHONDIBA DUDHATE
...
Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr.S.S.Birajdar h/f.
Mr.S.K.Chavan
Advocate for Respondent : Mr.Aditya V.Kasane h/f.
Mr.V.D.Salunke
...
CORAM : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J.
DATE : 25.08.2026
P.C. :
1] By way of this petition, the petitioners have
challenged the judgment and order dated 28.06.2018 passed
by the Ad-hoc District Judge, Parbhani in Misc. Civil Appeal
No.20/2017.
2] The learned Advocate for the petitioners submits
that Regular Civil Suit No.67/2016 itself is decided by the
judgment and order dated 17.04.2023.
3] In view of the same, nothing survives in the
present Petition and the same stands disposed of.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]
JUDGE
DDC
Checking your session…