Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KUSUM SHANKAR WANDHEKAR and ORS.versusSAGUNABAI BHAGWANT NEHUL and ORS.

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

Since the parties have settled the dispute, the writ petition is disposed of.

Summary

The petitioners, Smt. Kusum Shankar Wandhekar and others, filed a writ petition (No. 522 of 2005) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents, Smt. Sagunabai Bhagwant Nehul and others. The petition was heard before Justice Sachin S. Deshmukh. During the hearing, counsel for both sides informed the court that the parties had amicably settled the dispute. The court noted that, with the settlement, there was no longer any cause of action to be adjudicated. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petition. No further orders were made.

Subjects

  • settlement
  • writ petition
  • disposal
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:37585



                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD


                               WRIT PETITION NO.522 OF 2005


            Smt. Kusum Shankar Wandhekar & ors.          … PETITIONERS

                     VERSUS

            Smt. Sagunabai Bhagwant Nehul & ors.         … RESPONDENTS

                                                .......
            Mr. M.N. Kalyane, Advocate holding for
            Mr. G.B. Rajale, Advocate for petitioners
            Mr. P.B. Vikhe Patil, Advocate for respondent No.1. s
                                               ....…

                                     CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                     DATE      : 20th AUGUST, 2026

            PER COURT :


                        Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the parties

            have settled the dispute and as such, nothing survives in the petition.

            Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.




                                                  (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)




            fmp/-


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.