Bombay High Court
SHAIKH HAMID PEERMOHAMMADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
Holding
Both criminal writ petitions are dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioners filed two criminal writ petitions seeking a direction to register an FIR against respondent No.5. After filing, the petitioners failed to appear for any further proceedings, including taking circulation of the petitions. The Resource Personnel report confirmed that the petitioners never turned up for hearing. The Court observed that the petitioners were not interested in prosecuting the matter diligently. Consequently, the Court dismissed both criminal writ petitions on the ground of non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal writ petition can be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioners fail to appear for further proceedings
Subjects
- criminal writ petition
- FIR registration
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41299-DB
533.21wp+
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
915 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.533 OF 2021
SHAIKH HAMID PEERMOHAMMAD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS
...
APP for Respondent-State : Mr.G.A.Kulkarni
...
WITH
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 528 OF 2021
...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ.
DATE : 04.09.2026
P.C. :
None for the petitioners. Though the petitioners
have prayed for direction to register FIR against the
respondent no.5, but the report of the Resource Personnel
indicates that after filing these petitions, the petitioners
never turned up for taking circulation till today. Thus, it
appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting
the matter diligently. Accordingly, both Criminal Writ
Petitions stand dismissed for non-prosecution.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE]
JUDGE JUDGE
DDC
Checking your session…