Bombay High Court
SHAIKH HAMID PEERMOHAMMADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
Holding
Both Criminal Writ Petitions are dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioners filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 533 of 2021 seeking a direction to register an FIR against respondent No.5. The Court ordered a report from the Resource Personnel, which indicated that after filing the petitions, the petitioners never appeared for taking circulation. The Court observed that the petitioners showed no interest in prosecuting the matter diligently. Consequently, the Court held that the petitions could not be entertained due to lack of prosecution. Both Criminal Writ Petitions were dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal writ petition can be dismissed on the ground of non‑prosecution by the petitioners
Subjects
- criminal writ petition
- FIR registration
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41298-DB
533.21wp+
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
915 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.533 OF 2021
SHAIKH HAMID PEERMOHAMMAD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS
...
APP for Respondent-State : Mr.G.A.Kulkarni
...
WITH
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 528 OF 2021
...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ.
DATE : 04.09.2026
P.C. :
None for the petitioners. Though the petitioners
have prayed for direction to register FIR against the
respondent no.5, but the report of the Resource Personnel
indicates that after filing these petitions, the petitioners
never turned up for taking circulation till today. Thus, it
appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting
the matter diligently. Accordingly, both Criminal Writ
Petitions stand dismissed for non-prosecution.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE]
JUDGE JUDGE
DDC
Checking your session…