Bombay High Court
RUKMINBAI RAOSAHEB SHINDE AND ANOTHERversusNEELA VINAYAK NILANGEKAR AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The dismissal of the underlying suit extinguishes the cause of action, rendering the writ petition void and subject to disposal.
Summary
The petitioners, Rukminbai Raosaheb Shinde and another, filed Writ Petition No. 549 of 2024 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the dismissal of their underlying suit. The petitioners argued that the dismissal of the suit on 28 November 2025 left a cause of action for the writ petition. The respondent, Neela Vinayak Nilangekar, contended that the suit's dismissal extinguished any relief that could be sought through the writ. The Court examined whether any substantive relief remained after the suit was dismissed. Finding that the suit's dismissal left nothing for the writ petition to address, the Court ordered the writ petition to be disposed. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as there was no surviving cause of action.
Issues considered
- What is the effect of the dismissal of the underlying suit on the continuance of a writ petition filed thereafter?
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal of suit
- cause of action
- civil procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38722
4-sr904.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
904 WRIT PETITION NO. 549 OF 2024
Rukminbai Raosaheb Shinde And Another
VERSUS
Neela Vinayak Nilangekar And Others
----
Mr.M.B.Ubale, Advocate for petitioners
Mr.V.D.Sonawane, Advocate for respondent - sole
----
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATE : AUGUST 25, 2026
ORDER :-
Learned advocate for the petitioners submits that vide
judgment and order dated 28.11.2025, the suit itself is dismissed and
nothing survives in the present Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ
Petition stands disposed of.
[AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.]
………..
KBP
Checking your session…