Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BHARATI AMOL PATIL @ BHARATI PANDURANG KOLHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is disposed of, with the petitioner directed to pursue her grievance under the law.

Summary

The petitioner, Bharati Amol Patil, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a court order to correct the date of her representation from 10-02-2022 to 10-03-2022. The Anti‑Corruption Bureau (ACB) submitted internal communications showing that the representation had already prompted action for cheating and was forwarded to the Police Commissioner of Aurangabad. The court noted that the petitioner could now pursue her grievance under the applicable law and initiate criminal prosecution against the involved persons. Consequently, the court held that no further judicial direction was required beyond allowing the petitioner to follow the procedural route. The petition was therefore disposed of.

Issues considered

  • What relief, if any, is appropriate for correcting the date of the petitioner's representation?
  • Whether the court should intervene in the internal procedural steps taken by the Anti‑Corruption Bureau.

Subjects

  • criminal writ petition
  • representation correction
  • anti‑corruption bureau
  • cheating
  • police commissioner
  • procedural direction
  • grievance

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:42241-DB
                                                    (1)
                                                                 917 Cri. W. P. 551-2022.odt
                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                              CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 551 OF 2022

                      BHARATI AMOL PATIL @ BHARATI PANDURANG KOLHE
                                                VERSUS
                           THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                                    ...
                Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Gaurav L. Deshpande
                APP for Respondents: Mr. S. J. Salgare
                                                  ...

                                    CORAM :       SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, &
                                                  VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.J.

                                    DATED :       SEPTEMBER 11, 2026

                ORDER:-

                1.      Heard.

                2.      The petitioner is seeking direction in this petition to decide her

                representation dated 10.03.2022 which is wrongly mentioned as

                10.02.2022.



                3.      However, today the learned A.P.P. placed on record the internal

                communication of Anti Corruption Bureau, Aurangabad dated

                22.03.2022 along with the other correspondence. The correspondence

                dated 12.07.2022 issued by Police Inspector of Anti Corruption

                Bureau, Aurngabad to the Director General of Anti Corruption Bureau,

                Maharashtra State indicates that the contents of the aforesaid

                application of the petitioner, had in fact attracted action in respect of

                cheating and for that purpose, the said application needs to be
                                    (2)
                                                 917 Cri. W. P. 551-2022.odt
referred to the Police Commissioner of Aurangabad City. The said

internal correspondence is taken on record and marked as ‘X’

collectively, for identification.



4.     The direction in this petition is only to decide the representation

of the petitioner dated 10.03.2022 and the Anti Corruption Bureau,

Aurangabad, after considering the same, found it appropriate to

forward it to the Commissioner of Police, Aurangabad City.



5.     As such, the petitioner can now pursue his grievance as per the

provisions under law. The petitioner may take appropriate proceeding

under the provisions of law to initiate criminal prosecution of the

persons involved.



6.     In view of the same, with liberty to that effect, the petition

stands disposed of.



(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)              (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
      JUDGE                                  JUDGE

YSK/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.