Bombay High Court
JYOTSNABEN D/O KANTILAL PATELversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The investigation need not be transferred; the petition is dismissed.
Summary
The petitioner, Jyotsnaben, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the transfer of investigation of CR No.355 of 2024 (charges under Sections 302, 201 and 120B IPC) from the Azad Maidan Police Station to the CBI or State Investigation Department. The police had filed a B‑Summary Report which was rejected by the Judicial Magistrate, who ordered further investigation. The petitioner argued that the accused lacked mens rea in the alleged murder of her brother Amratlal Patel. The High Court examined whether a transfer was necessary and noted that the police had conducted a proper investigation and the magistrate had already directed further inquiry. Consequently, the Court held that no transfer was required and dismissed the petition.
Issues considered
- Whether the investigation of CR No.355 of 2024 should be transferred to the CBI or State Investigation Department under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Legislation cited
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 120B, 201, 302
Subjects
- transfer of investigation
- CBI
- Article 226
- murder
- mens rea
- high court
- writ petition
- criminal procedure
Judgment
ssm 6-wp5577.2025.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5577 OF 2025
Jyotsnaben D/o. Kantilal Patel …..Petitioner
Vs.
The State Of Maharashtra & Ors. …..Respondents
____________________________________
Mr. Anant Devkate a/w Adv. Seema S. Dighe i/by Adv. Priyal G. Sarda
for the Petitioner.
Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre APP, for the Respondent-State.
____________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 29th AUGUST, 2026.
P.C.:-
1) By this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
the Petitioner is seeking transfer of investigation of CR No.355 of 2024,
registered with Azad Maidan Police Station, Mumbai under Sections 302,
201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code to CBI or State Investigation
Department.
2) Record indicates that, after completion of investigation, the
Police had filed “B-Summary Report” in the Court of Judicial Magistrate
First Class, 64th Court, Esplanade, Mumbai. The said report was numbered
as C.C. No.1629/Misc/2025.
1/3
ssm 6-wp5577.2025.doc
3) Petitioner had filed a Protest Petition in the said Report. The
learned Magistrate allowed the said Protest Petition and rejected “B-
Summary Report” filed by the police in the said CR No.355/2024, by an
Order dated 31st July, 2025. The learned Magistrate has directed Azad
Maidan Police Station, Mumbai to conduct further investigation and submit
final report in that behalf.
3.1) In this precise background, Petitioner is seeking transfer of
investigation of the said crime.
4) The question which arises for consideration as to whether the
alleged accused persons were having any mens rea to commit alleged
murder of Amratlal Patel. Prima facie record indicates that, there was no
mens rea attributed to the accused persons.
4.1) It is the case of the Petitioner that, her brother Amratlal Patel
had undergone Angioplasty few days before the date of his demise, at
Surat. That, despite of having knowledge that long distance travel was not
permitted, the accused persons allegedly insisted to shift him in their car to
hospital at Mumbai. The accused persons did not avail the facility of
ambulance for shifting the deceased to Mumbai and also turned down the
request of Mr. Narendra and Smt. Geetaben Patel who were taking care of
the deceased to at least travel in ambulance. On 17 th April, 2021, Amratlal
Patel was declared dead when he was undergoing treatment. After
2/3
ssm 6-wp5577.2025.doc
completion of investigation, the police have filed “B-Summary Report” as
noted earlier.
5) Perusal of record indicates that, the police attached to Azad
Maidan Police Station, Mumbai have properly conducted investigation.
However, in view of the fact that, the learned Magistrate has now directed
the concerned Police station to conduct further investigation, we refrain
ourselves for making further comments.
6) In view of the above, we find that it is not necessary to transfer
the investigation of CR No.355 of 2024 registered with Azad Maidan Police
Station, Mumbai to any other agency.
7) Petition is accordingly disposed off.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
Digitally signed
by SANJIV
SANJIV SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR
MASHALKAR Date:
2026.09.09
13:14:26 +0530
3/3
Checking your session…