Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DEEPAK BARKU MALIversusDIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, NASIK AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is deemed infructuous and is disposed of.

Summary

Deepak Barku Mali filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Divisional Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Nasik and other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel argued that, owing to the passage of time, the subject matter of the petition had become infructuous and there was nothing left for the Court to consider. The Court accepted this submission, granting the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate authority and the cooperative court for any further relief. No substantive merits of the original grievance were examined. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is rendered infructuous due to lapse of time and therefore cannot be entertained?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • lapse of time
  • cooperative societies
  • jurisdiction

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:42169
                                                     1                      88-WP-5600-15.odt




                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD


                                    WRIT PETITION NO. 5600 OF 2015

                                          DEEPAK BARKU MALI
                                                  VERSUS
                      DIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, NASIK
                                              AND OTHERS
                                                    ...
                               Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Amol S. Gandhi
                            AGP for Respondents No.1 and 2 : Mr. P. P. Dawalkar
                            Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Nitin R. Bhavar
                                                    ...

                                              CORAM :        SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                              DATE       :   10-09-2026
                PER COURT:-

                1.       Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits

                that by the passage of time, the subject matter of the petition is

                rendered infructuous and nothing survives in the matter for

                consideration. This will not preclude the petitioners from filing

                application before the concerned authority and co-operative court.

                2.       With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition is disposed of.




                                                     [SACHIN S. DESHMUKH]
                                                             JUDGE

                rrd


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.