Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PHILIP JOHN BHAMBALversusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is dismissed as infructuous because the charge‑sheet has been filed.

Summary

Petitioner Philip John Bhambal filed a writ petition challenging an action of the authorities. The High Court directed that the investigation be transferred to the Crime Branch, after which a charge‑sheet was filed. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that, in view of the charge‑sheet, the petition had become infructuous. The Court agreed and disposed of the petition as infructuous, also ordering any pending applications to stand disposed. No further relief was granted.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate disposition of a writ petition when a charge‑sheet has been filed and the investigation completed?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • charge-sheet
  • investigation transfer
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                                                                          39-WP-564-2026 (CR).doc



                                      IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY
                                               CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                WRIT PETITION NO. 564 OF 2026

                      Philip John Bhambal                                     ..… Petitioner
                             VERSUS
                      The Union of India & Ors                                ..… Respondents
                                                       WITH
                                      INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 443 OF 2026
                                                        IN
                                          WRIT PETITION NO. 564 OF 2026
                                                        …
                      Mr. Hande Sachin, (Through VC) Advocate for Petitioner.

                      Mr. Shridhar A. Patil, Advocate for Respondent No. 1-Union of India.

                      Ms. Mahalakshmi Ganapathy, Additional PP for Respondent-State.
                                                         ...
                                                    CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL AND
                                                                ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
                                                    DATE      : 29 AUGUST 2026.
                      P. C. :

                      1.          Mr. Hande, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that

                      after directions of this Court the investigation has been transferred to the

                      crime branch. He further submits that charge-sheet has already been filed.

                      Therefore, the Petition has now become infructuous.

                      2.        In view of the above, the Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.

                      3.        In sequel, all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.



         Digitally
         signed by
         TALLE
TALLE    SHUBHAM
SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO                (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)                  (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
ASHOKRAO Date:
         2026.08.31
         14:34:11
         +0530



                      Shubham                                  1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.