Bombay High Court
NANASAHEB YEDUBA THORAT AND ORAversusPUNJABA DAGU THORAT AND ORS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that the stay application must be decided promptly and the execution of the order by Respondent No. 5 is stayed until that decision.
Summary
The petitioners filed a writ petition alleging that their appeal and accompanying stay application filed on 24‑02‑2026 before the Deputy Director of Land Records (Respondent No. 6) had not been heard, while an order from Respondent No. 5 was scheduled for execution. The petitioners sought a direction that the execution be stayed until the pending stay application is decided. The Court noted that the appeal and stay application were listed for hearing the next day and that no further orders were required except for expediting the stay decision. Accordingly, the Court directed that Respondent No. 6 decide the stay application as soon as possible and that Respondent No. 5 refrain from executing the order until such decision. The writ petition was thereafter disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the execution of the order passed by Respondent No. 5 should be stayed pending the decision on the stay application filed by the petitioners.
- Whether the Court should direct the Deputy Director of Land Records (Respondent No. 6) to decide the stay application promptly.
Subjects
- stay order
- execution of order
- land records
- writ petition
- interim relief
- court procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:40204
1 1152.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5661 OF 2026
NANASAHEB YEDUBA THORAT AND ORS
VERSUS
PUNJABA DAGU THORAT AND ORS
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Shingare Keshav F.
Addl. GP for Respondent/s – State : Ms. Kishor S. Hoke Patil
…
CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.
DATE : 03rd SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
1. The Petitioner has come before this Court with a limited
grievance that the Appeal filed by the Petitioner before Respondent no. 6
– The Deputy Director of Land Records, is not being heard and even the
stay Application filed by him has been kept lingering which is filed along
with his Appeal on 24.02.2026.
2. On the last date when the matter was listed, a request was
made by the learned Additional Government Pleader, to take instructions
about the stage of Appeal and the stay Application filed by the Petitioner.
3. Today when the matter is listed, the learned Additional
Government Pleader appearing for the State informs that the Appeal as
well as Application filed by the Petitioner are listed tomorrow for
hearing.
2 1152.odt
4. In view thereof, I do not find any orders are necessary to be
passed except that the stay Application shall be decided by Respondent
no. 6 as early as possible.
5. Learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that in fact, the
execution of the order passed by Respondent no. 5, is scheduled
tomorrow.
6. In view thereof, Respondent no. 5 shall not execute the order
until the stay application is decided by Respondent no. 6.
7. With the aforementioned directions, the Writ Petition stands
disposed of.
8. Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the
State, shall communicate this order.
9. The parties shall act upon the authenticated copy of this
order.
( MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. )
SPC
Checking your session…