Bombay High Court
RELIANCE COMMUNICATION LTD, AURANGABAD AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition does not survive after the Supreme Court's common judgment and is disposed of.
Summary
Reliance Communication Ltd. and others filed a writ petition (WP 5708 of 2015) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a matter that was also pending in other cases. The petitioners' counsel informed the Court that all similar matters, including the present one, had been transferred to the Supreme Court, which disposed of them by a common judgment. The High Court noted that the issue raised in the petition had already been comprehensively decided by the Apex Court. Consequently, the Court held that the petition could no longer survive as a separate proceeding. The petition was therefore disposed of by the High Court.
Issues considered
- What is the effect on a pending writ petition when the same issue has been finally decided by the Supreme Court?
Subjects
- writ petition
- maintainability
- Supreme Court decision
- petition disposal
- jurisdiction
Judgment
1 WP / 5708 / 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
901 WRIT PETITION NO. 5708 OF 2015
RELIANCE COMMUNICATION LTD, AURANGABAD AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for petitioners : Mr. Anand Bhandari
Addl.GP for the respondent – State : Mr. P.S. Patil
...
CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND
JITENDRA JAIN, JJ.
DATE : 25 AUGUST 2026
PER COURT :
Heard.
2. The petition was on Board dated 8th June, 2015. This
Court had directed learned Advocate for the petitioners to take
instructions as regards the present status.
3. Learned Advocate Shri Bhandari today informed that the
other matters as well as this matter, wherein the issue involved is the
same, all such matters were transferred to the Hon’ble Apex Court and
the Hon’ble Apex Court has disposed of all such matters by common
judgment and order. He submits taht the issue is already covered. He
could not get any instructions from the petitioners.
2 WP / 5708 / 2015
4. However, looking to the fact that many similar matters
were disposed of by the Hon’ble Apex Court, this Court finds that this
petiton does not survive as of now.
5. The petition, therefore, stands disposed of as such.
[ JITENDRA JAIN ] [ KISHORE C. SANT]
JUDGE JUDGE
arp/
Checking your session…