Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAOSAHEB YESUBA TAYADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

Respondent No.4 must decide the petitioner's representation on its merits within eight weeks and communicate the decision.

Summary

Petitioner Raosaheb Yesuba Tayade filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief regarding his representation dated 15 January 2025. The petition was heard by a two‑judge bench. The Court ordered Respondent No.4 to decide the representation on its merits, if it had not already done so, within eight weeks of receiving the order. The decision of Respondent No.4 must be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition was thereafter disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether Respondent No.4 is required to decide the petitioner's representation dated 15 January 2025 on its merits

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • representation
  • administrative decision
  • high court order

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:42339-DB


                                                                      wp5758-26.doc
                 drp
                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 WRIT PETITION NO.5758 OF 2026

                 Raosaheb Yesuba Tayade                               PETITIONER

                        VERSUS

                 The State of Maharashtra and Others               RESPONDENTS

                                                .......
                 Mr. P. S. Magar, Advocate for the Petitioner
                 Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP for Respondent - State
                                                ....…

                             [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
                                      ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.]

                                     DATE : 15th SEPTEMBER, 2026

                 ORDER :

                        The Writ Petition is disposed of by directing Respondent

                 No.4 to decide representation of the Petitioner dated 15 th

                 January, 2025, if not already decided, on its own merits, within a

                 period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order

                 and communicate the decision to the Petitioner.



                 [ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ]                 [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
                          JUDGE                                    JUDGE

                 drp/wp5758-26.doc


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.