Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KAILAS GANPATRAO SANAP AND ANOTHERversusTHE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR HINGOLI AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn and the deposited amount is ordered to be refunded with interest.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Mamlatdar under the Mamlatdar’s Courts Act, 1906. The High Court, on 15 June 2016, directed the petitioners to deposit Rs.10,000 as a show of bonafides. On 3 August 2026 the petitioners instructed their counsel to withdraw the petition and sought a refund of the deposit with interest. The Court accepted the withdrawal, ordered the refund of the Rs.10,000 along with any accrued interest, and disposed of the accompanying civil application No.8875 of 2026. The writ petition was therefore dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • What is the effect of a petitioner's request to withdraw a writ petition after depositing a bonafide amount?
  • Whether the deposited amount under the Court's direction is refundable with interest upon withdrawal of the petition?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Writ petition
  • Withdrawal
  • Mamlatdar’s Courts Act
  • Bonafide deposit
  • Refund
  • Civil application

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:37888


                                                      1                        901-wp-5934-2016.odt


                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 5934 OF 2016

                              Kailas Ganpatrao Sanap And Another
                                              VERSUS
                           The Additional Collector Hingoli And Others
                                                 ...
                      Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Shashikant S. Londhe
                            AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. K.S. Patil
                         Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. R.J. Nirmal
                                               WITH
                                CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8875 OF 2026
                                         IN WP/5934/2016
                                                ...
                                             CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.
                                                DATED     : AUGUST 21, 2026
              P.C.:

              1.          Learned advocate for the petitioners states that the petitioners

              have issued letter dated 03.08.2026 instructing him to withdraw the

              petition.    Letter dated 03.08.2026 issued by the petitioners to his

              advocate is taken on record.

              2.          Vide order dated 15.06.2016, this Court had directed to the

              petitioners to deposit an amount of Rs.10,000/- in order to show their

              bonafides. The subject matter of challenge in the petition is an order

              passed by the Mamlatdar under the Mamlatdar’s Courts Act, 1906. In

              view of above, amount of Rs.10,000/- be refunded to the petitioners

              along with accrued interest, if any.

              3.          Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn on motion made by
                                                     2                   901-wp-5934-2016.odt


             learned advocate for the petitioners.

             4.       Civil Application No.8875 of 2026 stands disposed of.




                                                         [ROHIT W. JOSHI J.]




Mujaheed//


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.