Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SATISH RAJMOHAN TANDONversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The petition is not maintainable and is disposed of.

Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking the registration of an FIR based on a complaint lodged with the police. The High Court examined the maintainability of such a petition in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Sujal Vishwas Attavar v. State of Maharashtra (2026 SCC OnLine SC 798). Relying on that precedent, the Court held that the petition was not maintainable. Consequently, the petition was dismissed and the matter was disposed of without any order for FIR registration.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition under Article 226 seeking registration of an FIR is maintainable?

Subjects

  • Article 226
  • Writ petition
  • FIR registration
  • Maintainability
  • Supreme Court precedent

Judgment

                           sns                                                   31-wp-594-2026.doc

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO.594 OF 2026

                      Satish Rajmohan Tandon                                      … Petitioner
                               V/s.
                      The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                             … Respondents


                      Mr. Samarth S. Karmarkar a/w. Adv. Tarun S. Shrivastava, Adv. Adarsh
                      Mishra for the Petitioner.
                      Mr. Ajay Patil, APP, for the Respondent-State.
                      Mr. Kuldeep Patil a/w. Adv. Digvijay S. Kachare, Adv. Anay Joshi, Adv. Sumit
                      Kumar Nimbalkar, Adv. Sanika Joshi, Adv. Saili Dhuru for the Respondent-
                      CBI.
                      Mr. P. P. Chavhan i/by Adv. Komal Punjabi for the Respondent-BMC.

                                                        CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                     KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                           DATE :    9th September, 2026
                      P.C.:-

                      1)              Present Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,

                      is for registration of F.I.R. in pursuance of the complaint filed by the

                      Petitioner with the concerned Police Authorities.

                      2)              In view of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the

                      case of Sujal Vishwas Attavar vs. State of Maharashtra reported in 2026

                      SCC OnLine SC 798, Petition is not maintainable and is accordingly

                      disposed off.



                                 (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                    (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

         Digitally
         signed by
                                                                                                      1/1
         SUMEDH
SUMEDH   NAMDEO
NAMDEO   SONAWANE
SONAWANE Date:
         2026.09.16
         11:40:59
         +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.