Bombay High Court
AYESHA SIDDIQUA MASOOD IQBALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that Respondent No.3 must decide the pending proposal within six weeks of receipt of the order.
Summary
Petitioner Ayesha Siddiqua Masood Iqbal filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition raised the issue of a pending proposal submitted by the petitioner on 30 July 2019 that had not been decided by Respondent No.3. The Court examined whether it could compel the respondent to adjudicate the proposal. It concluded that the petitioner was entitled to a timely decision and issued a directive. Respondent No.3 was ordered to decide the pending proposal within six weeks of receiving the order and to communicate the decision to the petitioner. The writ petition was thereby disposed of with this direction.
Issues considered
- Whether the Court should direct Respondent No.3 to decide the petitioner’s pending proposal dated 30 July 2019 within a specified time
Subjects
- Writ petition
- Administrative law
- Direction
- Pending proposal
- Maharashtra
- High Court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:39671-DB
{1} 14-wp-5973-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
14 WRIT PETITION NO. 5973 OF 2026
Ayesha Siddiqua Masood Iqbal
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
...
Mr. Mayur Subhedar h/f Mr. Ajay Deshpande, Advocate for the
Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Tambe, AGP for State
.......
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 31st AUGUST, 2026
PER COURT :
. The Writ Petition is disposed of by directing Respondent No. 3 to
decide pending proposal of the Petitioner dated 30.07.2019 within a
period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and
communicate decision to the Petitioner.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
Bhagyawant Punde
Checking your session…