Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

CHAMUNDA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERSversusMOSS REALTORS PVT LTD

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court allowed the filing of the Consent Terms, directed amendment of the petition, and ordered the State Government to be impleaded for court-fee liability.

Summary

The petitioners, Chamunda Builders and Developers, sought leave to file Consent Terms in the High Court after the trial court directed payment of court fees based on the original declaratory relief suit. Both parties admitted voluntarily executing the Consent Terms without coercion and agreed to resolve all disputes through the settlement. The Court took the Consent Terms on record, granted leave to file them, and directed the petitioner to amend the petition within a week. It also ordered that the State Government be impleaded as a respondent to address the issue of court-fee liability, with notice to be issued and served. The matter was adjourned to 28 September 2026 for compliance.

Issues considered

  • Whether the parties may file the Consent Terms in the High Court despite the trial court's order on court-fee liability
  • Whether the State Government should be impleaded to determine liability for court fees

Subjects

  • Consent Terms
  • court fees
  • writ petition
  • settlement
  • civil procedure
  • High Court
  • implementation of compromise

Judgment

                                                                         902-WP5977-2025.DOC

                                                                                      Santosh

                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                      WRIT PETITION NO. 5977 OF 2025

                      Chamunda Builders And Developers                         ...Petitioner
                                        Versus
                      Moss Realtors Pvt Ltd                                  …Respondent

                      Smt. Sunita Dube, i/by Nutan Moily, for the Petitioner.
                      Mr. Jeet Gandhi, for the Respondent.
SANTOSH
SUBHASH
KULKARNI                                                   CORAM:      N. J. JAMADAR, J.
Digitally signed by
SANTOSH SUBHASH                                            DATED:      20th AUGUST, 2026
KULKARNI
Date: 2026.08.31
19:50:24 +0530

                      PC:-

                      1.     Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

                      2.     The learned Counsel for the parties submit that the

                      parties had filed the Consent Terms before the trial Court.

                      However, by the impugned order, the learned Judge, City Civil

                      Court,   directed    that   in   accordance     with   the   terms   of

                      compromise, the parties shall pay the court-fees as the suit was

                      initially filed for declaratory reliefs only.

                      3.     The parties seek leave to file the Consent Terms in this

                      Court.

                             Leave granted.




                                                        1/3
                                                  902-WP5977-2025.DOC

4.    Mr. Sameer Bharadhwaj, the authorized representative of

the   Petitioner   and   Mr.   Rahul   Purohit,     the   authorized

representative of Moss Realtors Pvt Ltd. - Respondent are

present before the Court.      They admit the contents of the

Consent Terms and execution thereof. They submit that they

have voluntarily executed Consent Terms and there is no

coercion or duress. The Petitioner and Respondent are identified

by their respective Counsel.

5.    Upon being specifically inquired, the Petitioner and

Respondent admit that they are agreeable to the resolution of

the dispute in accordance with the Consent Terms.          It seems

that the Petitioner and Respondent have decided to resolve all

the issues and a comprehensive settlement has been arrived at

between the parties.

6.    The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’.

7.    Since the trial Court has raised the issue of liability of the

parties to pay the court-fees, it would be necessary to implead

the State Government as a party respondent to this petition.

8.    The Petitioner shall carry out the necessary amendment in

the petition within one week from the date of uploading of this

order.



                                2/3
                                             902-WP5977-2025.DOC

9.    Issue notice to the State Government through the

Government Pleader, Writ Cell, returnable on 28 th September,

2026.

10.   In addition to notice through Court, the Petitioner shall

serve the State Government by private service and file an

affidavit of service.

11.   Stand over to 28th September, 2026.

                                        [N. J. JAMADAR, J.]




                              3/3


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.