Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VINAY MOHAN LOHARversusTEJAL VINAY LOHAR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

Vinay Mohan Lohar filed a writ petition (No. 6070 of 2024) in the Bombay High Court against Tejal Vinay Lohar. The petitioner failed to appear before the court for three consecutive dates. The court recorded the non-appearance and noted that the petitioner had not prosecuted the petition. No substantive arguments or evidence were presented. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution.

Subjects

  • non-prosecution
  • petition dismissal
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                                                                           11-WP-6070-2024 (C).doc


                             S.S.Kilaje


                                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                         WRIT PETITION NO. 6070 OF 2024

                                   Vinay Mohan Lohar                                          ...Petitioner
                                   VERSUS
          Digitally signed
          by SONALI
                                   Tejal Vinay Lohar                                          ...Respondent
SONALI SATISH
       KILAJE
SATISH Date:
KILAJE 2026.08.21
       15:25:11
          +0530

                                   _________________________________________________________________

                                   None for Petitioner.
                                   None for Respondent.
                                   _________________________________________________________________

                                                                            CORAM     :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                            DATE      :   20th AUGUST, 2026.
                                   P.C. :

                                   1.            None for the petitioner.

                                   2.            It appears that for last three dates none present for the

                                   petitioner.

                                   3.            Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                                                                    (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                                                      Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.