Bombay High Court
SUNIL SHRIRAMLAL JAISWAL AND ANOTHERversusSHAIKH NAZEEM SHAIKH NAZMODDIN AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The court held that the phrase may be deleted and the order corrected.
Summary
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. In an order dated 23 September 2026, the court included the phrase “for challenging the same” in paragraph 2, lines 2‑3. The petitioners moved a speaking‑to‑minutes motion seeking deletion of that phrase. The court examined the request and found no substantive prejudice in removing the wording. Accordingly, the motion was allowed, the order was corrected, and the revised order was to be uploaded.
Issues considered
- Whether the phrase “for challenging the same” in paragraph 2 of the order dated 23‑09‑2026 should be deleted
Subjects
- writ petition
- court order amendment
- speaking to minutes
- high court
Judgment
1 order of order dated //
This Order is Speaking to Minutes wp6108.26 speaking to.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
902 WRIT PETITION NO. 6108 OF 2026
SUNIL SHRIRAMLAL JAISWAL AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
SHAIKH NAZEEM SHAIKH NAZMODDIN AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Bakal Vishal P.
Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. Thole Vinod I.
…
CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.
DATE : 30.09.2026
PER COURT :
1. The motion is moved by way of speaking to minutes in the
order dated 23.09.2026.
2. In the order dated 23.09.2026, in paragraph No. 2, line
Nos. 2 and 3 the portion “for challenging the same” be deleted.
3. The motion is allowed and disposed of.
4. The corrected order be uploaded.
( MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. )
Mahajansb/
Checking your session…