Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

STATE BANK OF INDIA THOR. ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

Since the directions have been complied with and possession handed over, the petition stands disposed.

Summary

The State Bank of India, as a secured creditor, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking enforcement of an earlier order directing the handover of physical possession of a secured asset. The Court had previously, on 04.08.2026, ordered that possession be transferred to the petitioner. On the present hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that the directions had been fully complied with and possession was already in the petitioner's hands. The Court observed that, with compliance, no further relief remained to be granted. Accordingly, the petition was dismissed and any pending applications were also disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether any relief remains for the petitioner after compliance with the earlier order directing possession of the secured asset

Subjects

  • secured creditor
  • possession
  • writ petition
  • compliance
  • dismissal
  • High Court
  • Bombay

Judgment

                                                                                               5_WP6159_25.doc



                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                                WRIT PETITION NO.6159 OF 2025

                            State Bank of India through its Authorized Officer
                            Mahesh Chaudhari                                   …             Petitioner
                            Vs.
                            State of Maharashtra and others                    …             Respondents

                            Mr. Navin Arora (through VC) for Petitioner.
                            Mr. B. V. Samant, Additional GP a/w. Mr. R. S. Pawar, AGP for Respondents-
                            State.

                                                         CORAM : MANISH PITALE &
                                                                 SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ.
                                                         DATE      : SEPTEMBER 01, 2026

                            P.C. :

                            .        Mr. Arora, learned counsel for the petitioner (secured creditor)
                            informs this Court that the directions contained in the order dated
                            04.08.2026 have been complied with and the physical possession of the
                            secured asset has been handed over to the secured creditor.

                            2.       In view of the above, nothing survives in this petition and it is
                            disposed of.

                            3.       Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.




                            (SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.)                         (MANISH PITALE, J.)




                            Minal Parab



MINAL    Digitally signed
         by MINAL
SANDIP   SANDIP PARAB
         Date: 2026.09.01
PARAB    15:13:28 +0530




                                                                                                          1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.