Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MANGESH SHANTARAM SHIGWANversusMALA MANGESH SHIGWAN

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The writ petition is disposed of as the parties have settled the dispute and submitted consent terms.

Summary

Mangesh Shantaram Shigwan filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against Mala Mangesh Shigwan. Both parties appeared before the Court and informed that the dispute had been settled out of court. Their counsel submitted signed consent terms detailing the settlement, which the Court recorded. After confirming that the parties understood and agreed to the terms, the Court considered the submissions. In view of the settlement and the consent terms, the Court disposed of the writ petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed on account of the parties' settlement and submission of consent terms

Subjects

  • settlement
  • consent terms
  • writ petition
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                                                          89-WP-6323-2026 (C).doc


                            S.S.Kilaje


                                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                      WRIT PETITION NO. 6323 OF 2026

                                  Mangesh Shantaram Shigwan                                 ...Petitioner
                                  VERSUS
                                  Mala Mangesh Shigwan                                      ...Respondent

                                  _________________________________________________________________
SONALI
         Digitally signed
         by SONALI                Mr. Abhishek Patil a/w. Mr. Prajyot Arulekar, Advocate for Petitioner.
SATISH
         SATISH KILAJE
         Date:
KILAJE   2026.08.24
         10:59:50 +0530           Ms. Kanchan Singh a/w. Mr. Anirudha Joshi, Advocate for Respondent.
                                  _________________________________________________________________

                                                                       CORAM       :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                       DATE        :   20th AUGUST, 2026.
                                  P.C. :

                                  1.         Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for

                                  respondent.

                                  2.         Both the learned counsel submit that the matter is settled out of

                                  the Court. Both the learned counsel tendered consent terms. It is taken on

                                  record and marked “X” for identification. The parties are present in Court.

                                  This Court enquired about the terms mentioned in the Consent terms. The

                                  parties have agreed for the same and confirmed that they are aware about

                                  the terms mentioned in the Consent Terms and their signatures on it.

                                  3.         Considering the submissions of both the learned counsel and in

                                  view of consent terms, Writ Petition is disposed off.



                                                                                 (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)


                                                                   Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.