Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KISHORE MAKHIJANIversusRIYA MAKHIJANI AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition was allowed to be withdrawn and consequently dismissed and disposed of.

Summary

Petitioner Kishore Makhijani filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner, through counsel G.C. Sawant, sought leave to withdraw the petition. The court considered the petitioner's request and, finding no objection, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the petition was dismissed and disposed of, and any pending applications were also disposed of. No substantive merits of the case were addressed as the petition was withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may be permitted to withdraw a criminal writ petition pending before the High Court

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • criminal writ petition
  • High Court procedure
  • disposal of pending applications

Judgment

                                                                                         50-WP-6357-2021 (CR).doc


                            S.S.Kilaje


                                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 6357 OF 2021
                                                                 WITH
                                                  INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4108 OF 2022

                                  Kishore Makhijani                                          … Petitioner
                                  VERSUS
                                  Riya Makhijani And Anr.                                    … Respondents
         Digitally signed
         by SONALI
SONALI   SATISH
         KILAJE
SATISH   Date:
KILAJE   2026.06.29
         12:04:06
         +0700                    _________________________________________________________________

                                  Mr. G.C.Sawant, Advocate for Petitioner.
                                  Mr. Jash B. Vyas a/w. Krupa Gohil, Advocate for Respondent.
                                  _________________________________________________________________

                                                                       CORAM         :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                       DATE          :   25th JUNE, 2026.
                                  P.C. :

                                   1.        Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner.

                                  2.         Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave

                                  to withdraw the Petition.

                                  3.         Considering the submission of learned counsel for the

                                  Petitioner, Petition is allowed to be withdrawn.

                                  4.         Dismissed and disposed of.

                                  5.         In view of disposal of Petition, pending applications, if any, also

                                  disposed of.



                                                                                 (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)



                                                                   Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.