Bombay High Court
SUBHASH NARSSAYYA KUNDENversusPUNE MUNICIPAL CORPN.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petition is dismissed for failure to prosecute due to the petitioner's non‑appearance.
Summary
Subhash Narssayya Kunden filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against the Pune Municipal Corporation. The petitioner failed to appear at the hearing scheduled on 11 December 2025. An adjournment was sought and granted on 7 July 2026, but the petitioner again did not appear for the final hearing. The Court noted the repeated non‑appearance and, as a last opportunity, stood the matter over to 7 September 2026 for dismissal. Consequently, the Court ordered the petition to be dismissed for failure to prosecute.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence of a petitioner's repeated failure to appear before the Court?
Subjects
- procedural law
- non‑appearance
- dismissal
- writ petition
- civil appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
31-WP-636-2003.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 636 OF 2003
Subhash Narssayya Kunden ...Petitioner
Versus
Pune Municipal Corporation ...Respondent
***
None for the Petitioner.
SNEHA
NITIN Mr. Abhishek Roy i/b Mr. A.P. Kulkarni for Respondent.
CHAVAN
Digitally signed by
***
SNEHA NITIN
CHAVAN
Date: 2026.08.31
CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J.
18:33:26 +0530
DATE : 31st AUGUST, 2026
P.C. :
1. On 11.12.2025, none appeared for petitioner.
2. On 07.07.2026, adjournment was sought and granted.
3. Today the matter is listed for final hearing, but nobody is
appearing for the Petitioner.
4. Stand over to 07.09.2026 as a last opportunity. To be listed for
‘dismissal’.
(M.M. SATHAYE, J.)
Sneha Chavan 1
Checking your session…