Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ARUNA NARENDRA SAWANTversusCHIEF OFFICER, MUMBAI BOARD, MHADA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is disposed as the petitioner’s grievance has been fully ventilated.

Summary

Aruna Narendra Sawant filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the alleged denial of allotment and possession of a flat by the Mumbai Development Authority (MHADA). The respondents, including the Chief Officer of the Mumbai Board, submitted that an allotment letter had already been issued to the petitioner and that possession had been handed over, attaching a possession letter and receipt dated 20 August 2026. The court examined the documents and found that the petitioner had indeed received possession of the allotted unit. Consequently, the court held that the petitioner’s grievance was fully ventilated. The petition was therefore disposed of without any further order.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to relief regarding the alleged denial of allotment and possession of the flat

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • allotment
  • possession
  • MHADA
  • disposal of petition

Judgment

                                                                                    8-wp 6422-26.doc
ARJUN
MACHHINDRA
KADAM                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by
ARJUN
MACHHINDRA
KADAM                                       WRIT PETITION NO. 6422 OF 2026
Date: 2026.08.25
18:07:41 +0530
                      Aruna Narendra Sawant                                       … Petitioner
                              Versus
                      Chief Officer, Mumbai Board, MHADA & Ors.                   ... Respondents

                                              __________________________

                      None for the Petitioner.
                      Mrs. Manisha Jagtap for the Respondent-MHADA.
                      Smt. V. R. Raje, AGP for the Respondent-State.
                                             __________________________

                                                      CORAM           : M. S. KARNIK AND
                                                                        SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.
                                                      DATED           : 25th AUGUST, 2026.

                      P.C. :

                      1.       Mrs. Jagtap, learned counsel for the respondent-MHADA submits

                      that the allotment letter has already been issued in favour of the petitioner.

                      Even the possession has been handed over and taken by the petitioner.

                      The communication dated 20th August, 2026 is placed on record enclosing

                      the possession letter and possession receipt.

                      2.       In such view of the matter, we see no reason to keep the petition

                      pending as the grievance of the petitioner is ventilated. The petition is

                      disposed of.




                      (SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)                                     (M. S. KARNIK, J.)


                       Amk                                                                  1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.