Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHRI. SUNIL AMRUTA BOBADE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that the writ petitions must be dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

Petitioners Shri Sunil Gokul Rane and Shri Sunil Amruta Bobade filed writ petitions (Nos. 7995/2021 and 6470/2021) before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitions were listed for dismissal, and the Court noted that Advocate Rajaram Deshmukh, who had previously appeared, was aware of the pendency. The Court observed that the petitioners had failed to prosecute the writ petitions. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petitions for non‑prosecution. An interim application filed in WP No. 6470/2021 was also held not to survive for consideration and was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petitions should be dismissed on the ground of non‑prosecution?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • dismissal
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

2026:BHC-KOL:9629-DB

                                                                       3-WP-7995-2021.doc


                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 7995 OF 2021

               Shri. Sunil Gokul Rane                                  ...Petitioner
                         Versus
               The State Of Maharashtra And Others                     ...Respondents

                                                 WITH
                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 6470 OF 2021

               Shri. Sunil Amruta Bobade                               ...Petitioner
                         Versus
               The State Of Maharashtra And Others                     ...Respondents

                                                  WITH
                                  INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 11214 OF 2024
                                                   IN
                                      WRIT PETITION NO. 6470 OF 2021

               Shri. Sunil Amruta Bobade                               ...Applicant
                         Versus
               The State Of Maharashtra And Others                     ...Respondents

                                              ——————
               Mr. Laxman Deshmukh, for the Petitioners.
               Mr. S.B.Kalel, AGP for the Respondent-State in WP No. 7995/2021.
               Mr. V.M.Mali, AGP for the Respondent-State in WP No. 6470/2021.
                                              ——————
                                               Coram : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH &
                                                          NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.
                                                 Date     : OCTOBER 06, 2026
               P. C. :

               1.        Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that he has already



               Arya Chavan                       1 of 2
                                                         3-WP-7995-2021.doc


given his no objection to the Petitioner and Advocate Rajaram

Deshmukh has filed his vakalatnama.

2.      The Petition is listed under the caption for dismissal. The order

indicates that Advocate Rajaram Deshmukh had appeared on the last

occasion, and is therefore aware of the pendency of the Petition.

3.      The Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

4.      Interim Application does not survive for consideration and stands

disposed of.




 [NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.]                     [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]




Arya Chavan                       2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.