Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DHAVAL PRAVIN GALA AND ANRversusTHE MAHARASHTRA REAL ESTATE REGULAR AUTHORITY AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioners, Dhaval Pravin Gala & Anr., filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority and others. After the purpose of the petition was achieved, the petitioners' counsel applied to withdraw the petition. The court considered whether a petition that has fulfilled its purpose may be withdrawn at the petitioners' request. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the matter was concluded and sought leave to withdraw. The court, after noting the request, allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn after its purpose has been achieved

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority

Judgment

                                                                                               901-WP.6547.2026.odt

      JVS.
                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                              CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                 WRIT PETITION NO. 6547 OF 2026

                             Dhaval Pravin Gala & Anr.                    }      Petitioners
                                  Versus
                             The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory       }
                             Authority & Ors.                             }      Respondents
          Digitally signed
          by PRAVIN
PRAVIN    DASHARATH
DASHARATH PANDIT
PANDIT    Date:
          2026.08.29
          10:57:42 +0530     Mr. Minil Shah i/b. Mr. Nilesh Gala, for the Petitioners.

                             Ms. Neha S. Bhide, Government Pleader with Dr. Dhruti M. Kapadia,
                             AGP for Respondent No. 4.


                                          CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ACJ. &
                                                  GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.
                                          DATE     : 28th AUGUST, 2026
                             P.C.:
                             1.           The learned Advocate for the Petitioners submits that the

                             purpose for which this Petition was filed, has been achieved. He prays for

                             leave to withdraw the Petition, on instructions from the Petitioner.




                             2.           In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off as withdrawn,

                             on instructions.




                             [GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.]                           [ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE]



                                                                    1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.