Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ANIL MADAM SURYAVANSHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The writ petition is infructuous and is to be disposed of.

Summary

The petitioners, represented by the legal heirs of the deceased Anil MadaM Suryawanshi, filed a writ petition seeking certain benefits. The petitioners' counsel informed the court that the deceased petitioner had already received all the benefits sought. Consequently, there was no remaining relief to be granted. The court examined whether the petition remained maintainable after the relief was fully granted. Finding that the petition was now moot, the court held it to be infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate disposition of a writ petition when the relief sought has already been granted to the petitioner?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • relief granted
  • petition disposal
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:41195-DB


                                                                         wp6663-24.doc
                 drp
                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD


                                  WRIT PETITION NO.6663 OF 2024

                 Anil MadaM Suryawanshi (Died) Through LRs            PETITIONERS

                        VERSUS

                 The State of Maharashtra and Others                  RESPONDENTS

                                              .......
                 Ms. Krutika B. Muttepod h/f Mr. S. K. Mathpati, Advocate for the
                 Petitioner

                 Mr. S. R. Wakle, AGP for Respondent - State
                 Mr. A. A. Jagatkar, Advocate for Respondents No.4 to 7
                                                ....…

                              [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
                                       ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.]

                                      DATE : 4th SEPTEMBER, 2026

                 ORDER :

                 1.     Learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that since the

                 deceased Petitioner has received all the benefits as sought in the

                 Writ Petition, nothing survives in the Petition.


                 2.     Writ Petition is, therefore, disposed of as infructuous.



                 [ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ]                   [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
                          JUDGE                                      JUDGE

                 drp/wp6663-24.doc


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.