Bombay High Court
MAHADABAI VITTALRAO PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition was dismissed as infructuous because the term of the local body had ended.
Summary
Mahadabai Vittalrao Patil filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an action of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner argued that the matter was still maintainable. The court observed that the term of the local body concerned had expired, rendering the petition moot. Consequently, the petition could no longer be entertained. The court therefore disposed of the petition as infructuous, without addressing any substantive merits.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition remains maintainable when the term of the local body under dispute has expired
Subjects
- local body
- writ petition
- infructuous
- jurisdiction
- termination of term
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38096
3-wp6683.2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
903 WRIT PETITION NO. 6683 OF 2024
Mahadabai Vittalrao Patil
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through District Collector And Others
----
Mr.S.N.Janakwade, Advocate for petitioner
Mr.K.B.Jadhavar, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 2
Ms.Nikita Boi
----
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATE : AUGUST 20, 2026
ORDER :-
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the term
of the local body is over and the petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of as
infructuous.
[AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.]
………..
KBP
Checking your session…