Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NIYOJIT SHREE CHATRAPATI SHAHU MAGASVARGIYA GRAHNIRMAN SAHAKARI SANSTHA MARYADIT KAGALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition, disposing it with liberty as prayed.

Summary

The petitioner, Niyojit Shree Chatrapati Shahu Magasvargiya Grahnirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Kagal, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition in order to pursue appropriate remedies before the State Government. The Court considered whether it could allow the withdrawal of the petition and any pending applications. Finding no impediment, the Court permitted the withdrawal, granting the petitioner liberty as prayed. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn and any applications were also dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition and the effect on any pending applications

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • Maharashtra

Judgment

2026:BHC-KOL:8208-DB

                                                                           2-WP-6691-2023.doc


                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                    WRIT PETITION NO. 6691 OF 2023


               Niyojit Shree Chatrapati Shahu Magasvargiya                ...Petitioner
               Grahnirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Kagal
                         Versus
               State Of Maharashtra And Ors.                              ...Respondents

                                               ——————
               Mr. Aniket Ranade, for the Petitioner.
               Ms. Tejas Kapre, AGP for the Respondent-State.
               Ms. Neha Deshpande i/b Dr. Uday Warunjikar, for the Respondent No. 6.
                                               ——————
                                                 Coram :     SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH &
                                                             NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.
                                                 Date      : AUGUST 29, 2026
               P. C. :

               1.        Learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks

               permission to withdraw the Petition to pursue appropriate remedies

               before the State Government. The Petition is disposed of as withdrawn

               with liberty as prayed.

               2.        Applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and stand

               disposed of.




                [NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.]                      [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]



               Arya Chavan                        1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.