Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SONTAKKE MORESHWAR AVICHANDRAversusMAHARASHTRA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION THRU. CHAIRMAN

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Sontakke Moreshwar Avichandra, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay challenging the Maharashtra Public Service Commission. Counsel for the petitioner sought a pass over to take further instructions. After receiving instructions, the petitioner expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The court, upon the petitioner's request, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • Maharashtra Public Service Commission

Judgment

        signed by
        GAURI AMIT
GAURI   GAEKWAD
AMIT
GAEKWAD Date:
        2026.09.03
        12:31:58
        +0530                                     1              921-wp-6699-2026.odt


                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                             CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                               WRIT PETITION NO. 6699 OF 2025

             Sontakke Moreshwar Avichandra                             … Petitioner
                   versus
             Maharashtra Public Service Commission & Anr.              … Respondents
                                            ……
             Dr.Uday P. Warunjikar with Mr.Sumit Kate i/b. Ms.Gargi Warunjikar for
             the Petitioner.

             Mr.Shekhar Jagtap for the Respondent – MPSC.

             Mrs.Neha S. Bhide, Government Pleader with Mr.P.P.Kakade, Addl.GP
             and Dr.Dhruti M.Kapadia, AGP for the Respondent -State.

             Dr.Milind Sathe, Senior Advocate with Mr.Rahul Nerlekar and
             Ms.Amruta Nerlekar for Respondent No.2.
                                            …...

                                 CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ACJ
                                             &
                                         GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.


                                  DATE      : 02 SEPTEMBER, 2026

             P.C.:

             1.           This matter was heard for quite some time.


             2.           The learned Advocate for the Petitioner sought a pass over

             to take instructions.   After taking instructions, he submits that the

             Petitioner desires to withdraw this Petition.
                                                                             Trupti S. Bamne
                                  2                921-wp-6699-2026.odt




3.          In view of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed off as

withdrawn, on instructions.




(GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.)                    (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)




                                                              Trupti S. Bamne


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.