Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

AKSHAY SURESH ZANJAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE GP AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition does not survive and is disposed of.

Summary

The petitioner, Akshay Suresh Zanjare, filed a writ petition seeking relief to file a necessary examination form with the concerned institute. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition was rendered moot because the petitioner had been permitted to submit the examination form. The court examined whether the petition still required adjudication in light of the permission granted. Finding that the petitioner had already obtained the requisite permission, the court held that there was no longer any dispute to resolve. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as it did not survive. The matter was ordered to be disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be entertained when the petitioner has already been permitted to file the examination form

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • procedural dismissal
  • examination form
  • court disposition

Judgment

                                                                                    21-wp-6728-2026.doc



                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                          WRIT PETITION NO.6728 OF 2026

                     Akshay Suresh Zanjare                    ..            Petitioner
                     V/S.
                     The State Of Maharashtra Thr The ..                   Respondents
                     GP And Ors
                                                   -------------------
                     Mr. Shashank Shubam, for the Petitioner.
                     Mr. P.V. Nelson Rajan, AGP, for Respondent No. 1.
        Digitally
        signed by
                     Ms. Gayatri Kale, i/by Rajendra Anbhule, for Respondents/Pune
        VARSHA
VARSHA DEEPAK
DEEPAK GAIKWAD
                     University.
GAIKWAD Date:
        2026.05.28
        18:55:01
        +0530
                                                   --------------------
                                                  CORAM :          SHYAM C. CHANDAK &
                                                                   SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ.
                                                                   (VACATION COURT)
                                                    DATE : 28TH MAY 2026.
                     PC:


                     1.        Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the petition has
                     been worked out as the Petitioner has been permitted to file the
                     necessary examination form and submit it to the Institute concerned.
                     2.        In view thereof, the petition does not survive and stands
                     disposed of accordingly.


                     (SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.)                      (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)




                      varsha                                                                    1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.