Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NISHANT ANNASAHEB GHATAGEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings before the trial court.

Summary

The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a writ of certiorari to set aside a judgment dated 14 July 2026 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate in RCC No.117 of 2018, alleging illegality, invalidity and incorrectness. He requested the court to examine the legality, validity and correctness of that judgment. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the writ petition and instead pursue appropriate relief before the trial court. The State’s counsel did not oppose the request. The bench granted leave to withdraw the petition and directed that any future application before the trial court be decided on its merits. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the criminal writ petition and seek relief in the trial court

Subjects

  • writ of certiorari
  • withdrawal of petition
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • High Court
  • quash order
  • trial court

Judgment

                                                                 1/2
                                                                                  18-WP-674-2026 (CR).DOC


                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                             CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

                                              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 674 OF 2026

                        Nishant Annasaheb Ghatage                                    …...Petitioner
                              VERSUS
                        The State Of Maharashtra And Another                         …...Respondents

                        _________________________________________________________________


                        Mr. Sukumar Ghanavat, for Petitioner.
                        Dr. Ashvini A. Takalkar, APP, for Respondent No.1 - State.
                        PSI, Reshma Khot, Sangli City Police Station, present.
                        _________________________________________________________________



                                              CORAM       :     ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
                                              DATE        :     7th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
                        P.C.

          Digitally
          signed by
          SHANTANU
SHANTANU SHANKARSA
SHANKARSA DHUDUM
                        1.          Heard Mr. Sukumar Ghanavat, learned Advocate for the
DHUDUM    Date:
          2026.09.07
          19:21:49
          +0530
                        Petitioner and Dr. Ashvini A. Takalkar, learned A.P.P., for Respondent No.1 –

                        State.


                        2.           By the present Petition, the Petitioner has sought the following

                        substantial relief:


                                    “a) This Hon’ble High Court be pleased issue writ of
                                       certiorari of writ in the nature of certiorari or any other
                                       appropriate writ and call for records and proceedings
                                       pertaining    to   the    Judgment   and    order    dated
                                       14/07/2026 passed by Ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate,
               Shantanu S. Dhudum
                                                2/2
                                                                         18-WP-674-2026 (CR).DOC


                        Sangli in below Exhibit-19 in R.C.C. No.117 of 2018
                        and   after   examining       its    legality,   validity   and
                        correctness of the same, this Hon’ble Court be pleased
                        to quash and set aside the same.”


         3.          Mr. Sukumar Ghanavat, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, on

         instructions from the Petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw the present

         Petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings before the Trial Court,

         as may be available to the Petitioner in terms of law.


         4.          This request is not opposed by Dr. Ashvini A. Takalkar, learned

         A.P.P. for Respondent No.1 – State.


         5.          In view of the statement made by Mr. Sukumar Ghanavat,

         learned Advocate for the Petitioner, leave is granted to withdraw this

         Petition with liberty as prayed for.


         6.          If any Application is filed before the Trial Court, the same shall

         be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law.


         7.          Criminal Writ Petition No.674 of 2026 is disposed of as

         withdrawn.




                                                            ( ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)




Shantanu S. Dhudum


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.