Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

AVINASH REVU JADHAV ( IN PERSON)versusMAHARASHTRA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONE THRU SECRETARY AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

A writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear despite scheduled hearings.

Summary

Avinash Revu Jadhav filed Writ Petition No.6825 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Maharashtra Public Service Commission and the State of Maharashtra. The Court fixed hearing dates on 31 July 2026 and 11 September 2026. The petitioner was absent on both occasions. The Court observed that the petitioner’s repeated non‑appearance demonstrated a lack of interest in prosecuting the matter. Consequently, the Court held that the petition could be dismissed for non‑prosecution. The writ petition was therefore dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear before the Court despite notices

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • court procedure
  • dismissal
  • civil appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                 WRIT PETITION NO.6825 OF 2026
                            Avinash Revu Jadhav                                       .. Petitioner
                                    Vs.
                            Maharashtra Public Service Commission & Anr.              .. Respondents


                            None for the Petitioner.
                            Mr. P.P. Kakade with Ms. Pranali Kakade and Mr. Sankalan Das,
                            Advocates for Respondent No.1-MPSC.
                            Ms. Kavita N. Solunke, Additional Government Pleader for Respondent
                            No.2-State of Maharashtra.


                                                   CORAM :          SUMAN SHYAM &
                                                                    GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, JJ.

                                                   DATE       :     22nd September, 2026.

                            P.C. :


                            1.       None for the Petitioner. The Petitioner was absent even on earlier

                            two consecutive occasions i.e. on 31st July, 2026 and 11th September,

                            2026. Thus, we are of the clear opinion that the Petitioner has no more

                            interest in prosecuting this matter. In view thereof, this Writ Petition is

                            dismissed for non-prosecution.




                            [ GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J. ]                        [ SUMAN SHYAM, J. ]



         Digitally signed
SNEHA by SNEHA
      ABHAY DIXIT
                                                                  1/1
ABHAY Date:
      2026.09.22
                            7-WP-6825-2026.doc                                                        Dixit
DIXIT 14:35:46
      +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.