Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SOMNATH JAYSING KADAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Somnath Jaysing Kadam, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 685 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench. The Court, after hearing the petitioner's counsel, expressed its disinclination to entertain the petition. The petitioner then sought leave to withdraw the petition, which was sought through his advocate, Mahesh Bhosale. The Court accepted the request to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal writ petition can be withdrawn after the Court has expressed disinclination to entertain it

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • criminal writ petition
  • high court discretion
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                                                                              22-WP-685-2026 (CR).odt




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                       CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                      CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 685 OF 2026

                      Somnath Jaysing Kadam                               ]      Petitioner

                                 versus

                      The State of Maharashtra and another                ]      Respondents

                                                        .....
                      Mr. Mahesh Bhosale, Advocate for Petitioner.
                      Ms. Mahalakshmi Ganapathy, Addl. P.P, for Respondent No.1 – State.
         Digitally
         signed by
                                                        .....
         SHAILAJA
SHAILAJA SHRIKANT
SHRIKANT HALKUDE
HALKUDE Date:
         2026.09.04
         10:40:13
                                                              CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.
         +0530
                                                              DATE  : SEPTEMBER 3, 2026
                      PER COURT :

                      1.                  After hearing the learned Advocate for the Petitioner for some

                      time, this Court expressed its disinclination to entertain the Petition. At that

                      time, on instructions, the learned Advocate for the Petitioner sought leave to

                      withdraw the Petition. His statement is accepted.

                      2.                  In view of the statement, the Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.




                                                                                (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)




                      Shailaja                                                                            Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.