Bombay High Court
PUSHPA NAGORAO SABNISversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Petitioner Pushpa Nagorao Sabnis filed a writ petition (WR 6854 of 2014) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. On 20 August 2026, the court recorded the absence of the petitioner's counsel and noted that no representative appeared on the scheduled date. The petition was subsequently posted for dismissal on 27 August 2026. Since the petitioner failed to appear or prosecute the petition, the court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to appear or prosecute a writ petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- procedural default
- court procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38943
51 WP6854.2014
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
51 WRIT PETITION NO. 6854 OF 2014
PUSHPA NAGORAO SABNIS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. R. B. Dhaware
Advocate for Respondent No.2: Mr. Amit A. Mukhedkar
...
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
Date : 27.08.2026
PER COURT :-
1. On 20.08.2026, recording absence of learned counsel
for the Petitioner, the Petition was posted for dismissal today.
Even today, none present for the Petitioner.
2. As such, the Writ Petition stands dismissed for want of
prosecution.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
marathe
Checking your session…