Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR PUNEversusSAJJADE NASHIN SHIYA KABRASTAN THR ITS PRESIDENT ATHAR ABBAS MOHAMMED HUSSAIN INAMDAR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

Leave to withdraw the writ petition was granted and the petition was disposed as infructuous.

Summary

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court against Sajjade Nashin Shiya Kabrastan and others. The petitioners, through counsel, later sought leave to withdraw the petition on the ground that it had become infructuous. The Court, after hearing the application, granted leave to withdraw and ordered that the petition stand disposed as infructuous. No observations were made on the merits of the underlying dispute. The order was pronounced by Justice Shyam C. Chandak in a vacation court sitting.

Issues considered

  • Whether leave may be granted to withdraw a writ petition that has become infructuous

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • infructuous
  • high court
  • civil appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

WAKLE
MANOJ
JANARDHAN
                      Manoj                                                              5-WP-6883-2026.doc
Digitally signed by
WAKLE MANOJ
JANARDHAN
Date: 2026.05.28
19:11:00 +0530
                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                          WRIT PETITION No.6883 OF 2026


                      The State of Maharashtra
                      Through District Collector Pune & Ors.                       …. Petitioners
                            Vs.
                      Sajjade Nashin Shiya Kabrastan
                      Through Its President
                      Athar Abbas Mhammed Hussain Inamdar
                      Urf Raju Inamdar & Ors.                                      …. Respondents


                      Smt. Pooja Patil, AGP for the Petitioners-State.
                      Adv. P. V. Alwani , for the Respondent No.1.


                                           CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.
                                           DATED : 28th MAY, 2026
                                                   (VACATION COURT)

                      P.C. :-

                      .              Learned Counsel for the Petitioners, on instructions, seeks leave

                      to withdraw the aforesaid Petition stating that the Petition has become

                      infructuous.

                      2)             Leave to withdraw is granted.

                      3)             Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.

                      4)             It is made clear that, there is no observation about the merits of

                      the matter.


                                                                (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)




                                                                                                          1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.