Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BIO CLEAN SYSTEMS INDIA PVT LTD THR AUTHORIZED PERSON APPASO BALVANT JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT AND OTHERS

Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition and kept the parties' contentions open for future proceedings.

Summary

The petitioner, Bio-Clean Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. During the pendency of the petition, the respondents issued a blacklisting order against the petitioner. The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition so that it could initiate separate proceedings specifically challenging the blacklisting order. The Court granted the petitioner's request, allowing the withdrawal of the writ petition while keeping all parties' contentions open for future litigation. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the pending writ petition in order to file separate proceedings challenging the blacklisting order.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • blacklisting order
  • administrative law
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                                              901-Wp-694-2026.doc


          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                     WRIT PETITION NO. 694 OF 2026

Bio-Clean Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd.                 … Petitioner
        Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                     … Respondents



                                  ——————
Ms. Shruti P. Ghodake for Petitioner.
Mr. A.P. Vanarase, A.G.P. for Respondent-State.
Mr. Ramdas Hake Patil a/w. Mr. Rushikesh Patil for Respondent Nos.4 & 5.

                                ——————

                                  Coram :      R.G. AVACHAT &
                                               AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ.

                                  Date     :   17th February 2026.

PER COURT :

1.    Ms. Shruti Ghodake, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that

certain developments have occurred during the pendency of the present

Petition. She submits that, during the pendency thereof, the Respondent-

Authorities have passed an order of blacklisting against the Petitioner. The

Petitioner intends to challenge the said blacklisting order by initiating

appropriate proceedings. She, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the present




osk                               1 of 2
                                                                                   901-Wp-694-2026.doc


                     Petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings impugning the said

                     blacklisting order.

                     2.       Leave granted as prayed for.

                     3.       Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.

                     4.       All contentions of both the parties are kept open.



                          [ AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. ]                     [ R.G. AVACHAT, J. ]



           Digitally signed
           by OMKAR
OMKAR      SHIVAHAR
SHIVAHAR   KUMBHAKARN
KUMBHAKARN Date:
           2026.02.17
           18:21:39 +0530




                     osk                                 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.