Bombay High Court
MUSTAFA MUKHTAR KUNGALE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU AUTHORITY AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petition is disposed subject to the petitioners producing the required documents by 9 June 2026, failing which demolition will proceed.
Summary
The petitioners, Mustafa Mukhtar Kungale and others, filed a civil writ petition challenging the demolition of a structure they claimed was authorized. The Court directed the petitioners to produce documents proving the legality of the structure before the Tahsildar and Executive Magistrate of Kalyan by 9 June 2026. Upon production, the respondent authority was to decide the matter within two weeks, during which no coercive action could be taken. The petitioners also agreed that if they failed to produce the documents, they would demolish the structure themselves within one week of the deadline, otherwise the competent authority could demolish it. The Court disposed of the petition subject to these terms.
Issues considered
- What evidence is required to establish that the structure is authorized and legal?
- Whether the petitioners must produce the documents within the stipulated time to avoid demolition
- Whether the competent authority may demolish the structure if the petitioners fail to comply
Subjects
- civil writ petition
- unauthorised structure
- demolition
- compliance order
- procedural direction
Judgment
P.H. Jayani 25 WP6974.2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 6974 OF 2026
Mustafa Mukhtar Kungale and Ors. …. Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. …. Respondents
Mr. Vishal A. Patil for the Petitioners.
Shri. V.D. Badgujar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 – State.
CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK AND
FARHAN P. DUBASH, JJ.
DATED : 03rd JUNE, 2026
(VACATION COURT)
P.C. :-
1) After hearing the Petition for some time, Mr. Badgujar, the
learned AGP, on instructions, submitted that let the Petitioner produce the
relevant documents establishing his contention that the subject matter
structure is authorized and legal. Upon production of such documents, the
Respondent No.3 – The Tahsildar and Executive Magistrate, Kalyan, Dist.
Thane shall examine the matter and dispose of the same in accordance with
the law.
2) Mr. Shaikh, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions
states that the Petitioner will produce the required documents before the
Respondent No.3 on or before 9th June, 2026.
3) Once the Petitioner produces the documents within stipulated
period as stated above, Respondent No.3 shall decide the matter within two
1/2
P.H. Jayani 25 WP6974.2026.doc
weeks therefrom. During the said two-week period, no coercive action shall
be taken against the Petitioner.
4) Mr. Shaikh, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on
instructions, agreed that if the Petitioner fails to produce the documents as
aforesaid, the Petitioner shall demolish the subject matter structure himself
within one week from 9th June, 2026. The said statement is accepted.
4.1) Otherwise, the Competent Authority will be at liberty to take
necessary measures to demolish the subject structure in accordance with the
law.
5) Petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms.
(FARHAN P. DUBASH, J.) (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)
PREETI
HEERO
JAYANI
Digitally signed by
PREETI HEERO
JAYANI
Date: 2026.06.03
19:35:03 +0530
2/2
Checking your session…