Bombay High Court
BHAGATRAM RAVALMAL BALANI AND OTHERSversusPRASHANT SURESH ANIK AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition is deemed infructuous and is disposed of accordingly.
Summary
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging a decision of a local body. Over time, the term of the local body expired, rendering the subject matter of the petition moot. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time and the expiry of the local body's term. The Court agreed that the petition could no longer be entertained as the relief sought was no longer available. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous, with the Court leaving the door open for any future contentions if needed.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition becomes infructuous and non-maintainable when the term of the local body concerned expires?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- local body
- termination of jurisdiction
- procedural disposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38022
1
910-wp-6976-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6976 OF 2024
Bhagatram Ravalmal Balani And Others
VERSUS
Prashant Suresh Anik And Others
...
Mr. Girish S. Rane, Advocate for the Petitioners
…..
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATED : 21ST AUGUST, 2026
P.C. :-
. Mr. Girish S. Rane, learned Advocate for the petitioners
submits that with the passage of time and upon expiry of the
term of the local body, the petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of the above, Writ Petition stands disposed of as
infructuous.
3. All contentions kept open for future, if needed.
( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. )
Rushikesh/2026
Checking your session…