Bombay High Court
TUFAIL AHMED CHOUDHARY AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRUAUTHORITY AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petition is disposed subject to the petitioners producing the required documents by the stipulated date, failing which they must demolish the structure.
Summary
The petitioners sought relief concerning a structure they claimed was authorized. The Court directed the petitioners to produce documents proving the legality of the structure before the Tahsildar and Executive Magistrate of Kalyan by 9 June 2026. If the documents are produced, the respondent authority must decide the matter within two weeks, and no coercive action may be taken during that period. The petitioners also agreed that failure to produce the documents would require them to demolish the structure within one week of 9 June 2026, after which the competent authority may take demolition action if necessary. The Court disposed of the petition on these terms.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioners have produced sufficient documentary evidence to establish that the subject structure is authorized and legal
- Whether the petitioners must demolish the structure if they fail to produce the required documents
Subjects
- civil writ petition
- unauthorised construction
- document production
- demolition order
- procedural direction
Judgment
P.H. Jayani 27 WP6977.2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 6977 OF 2026
Tufail Ahmed Choudhary and Ors. …. Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. …. Respondents
Mr. Vishal A. Patil for the Petitioners.
Shri. V.D. Badgujar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 – State.
CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK AND
FARHAN P. DUBASH, JJ.
DATED : 03rd JUNE, 2026
(VACATION COURT)
P.C. :-
1) After hearing the Petition for some time, Mr. Badgujar, the
learned AGP, on instructions, submitted that let the Petitioner produce the
relevant documents establishing his contention that the subject matter
structure is authorized and legal. Upon production of such documents, the
Respondent No.3 – The Tahsildar and Executive Magistrate, Kalyan, Dist.
Thane shall examine the matter and dispose of the same in accordance with
the law.
2) Mr. Shaikh, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions
states that the Petitioner will produce the required documents before the
Respondent No.3 on or before 9th June, 2026.
3) Once the Petitioner produces the documents within stipulated
period as stated above, Respondent No.3 shall decide the matter within two
1/2
P.H. Jayani 27 WP6977.2026.doc
weeks therefrom. During the said two-week period, no coercive action shall
be taken against the Petitioner.
4) Mr. Shaikh, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on
instructions, agreed that if the Petitioner fails to produce the documents as
aforesaid, the Petitioner shall demolish the subject matter structure himself
within one week from 9th June, 2026. The said statement is accepted.
4.1) Otherwise, the Competent Authority will be at liberty to take
necessary measures to demolish the subject structure in accordance with the
law.
5) Petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms.
(FARHAN P. DUBASH, J.) (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)
PREETI
HEERO
JAYANI
Digitally signed by
PREETI HEERO
JAYANI
Date: 2026.06.03
19:35:15 +0530
2/2
Checking your session…