Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

IMRAN MEHANDI @ DILAWAR NASEER SHAIKH (A-35973)versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is dismissed as the relief sought is general and not specific to any individual prisoner.

Summary

The petitioner, a prisoner, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State to provide police escorts for prisoners requiring urgent medical assistance at a civil hospital. The petition sought a general direction for all such prisoners rather than a specific order for the petitioner. The respondents contended that under Rule 11 of the Prison Hospital Rules, police escorts are provided in emergencies and there is no delay in transferring prisoners to hospitals. The court observed that the reliefs pleaded were overly broad and not directed at any individual prisoner, rendering the petition non‑maintainable. Consequently, the court disposed of the petition without granting any relief.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued to direct the State to provide police escorts for prisoners needing urgent medical assistance.
  • Whether the petition is maintainable when the relief sought is of a general nature and not specific to an individual prisoner.

Subjects

  • mandamus
  • police escort
  • prisoner medical assistance
  • prison hospital rules
  • writ petition
  • procedural law

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:42351-DB

                                              1                   920 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 700 OF 2022



                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                    920 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 700 OF 2022
                 IMRAN MEHANDI @ DILAWAR NASEER SHAIKH (A-35973)
                                           VERSUS
                      THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
                                             ...
            Adv. R. A. Jaiswal (appointed Through Legal Aid), Advocate for the
            Petitioner
            Adv. S. J. Salgare, APP for Respondents-State
                                             ...

                                         CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                 VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                         DATED : 11/09/2026
            Per Court:

            .           Heard.


            2.          The petitioner has prayed following reliefs in this petition:

                 “(c)     By Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order
                 or directions in the like nature to direct the respondents to
                 immediately provide police escorts to prisoners (including
                 petitioner) who are in need of urgent medical assistance from
                 Civil Hospital pending hearing of the petition.

                 (d)      By Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order
                 or directions in the like nature to direct the respondents to
                 provide police escorts to prisoners who are in need of urgent
                 medical assistance from Civil Hospital.”

                        However, on going through the aforesaid reliefs the same are
            general in nature and not in respect of any individual prisoner.
                               2                   920 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 700 OF 2022



3.         The learned APP on instructions, submits that the jail

authorities normally provide medical aid as and when such

medical emergency arises and the concerned prisoners are taken to

Civil Hospital. Even otherwise, also, it is mentioned in the affidavit-

in-reply filed by the respondent mentioned as follows:

             “The deponent further says and submits that, as per rule
     11 of prison hospital rules in case of emergency and after
     taking the opinion of the doctors of jail hospitals in such cases
     the office of deponent used to shift such convicts/prisoners to
     the hospitals which are situated outside the jail premises on
     making availability of police escort. There is no delay for
     shifting the convicts/prisoners to the hospitals on the part of the
     office of deponent. However, in cases as like as the case of
     petitioner unless the police escorts is made available the office
     of deponent does not shift such convicts/prisoners to the
     hospital situated at outside the premises of jail.”

4.         In view of the same, nothing survives in this petition and it

stands disposed of.




( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. )

shivani/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.