Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAJESH SHUBHASH AATKIREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Rajesh Shubhash Aatkire, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, challenging an action of the State of Maharashtra. The Court, after hearing the petitioner's counsel, expressed its reluctance to interfere with the relief sought in the petition. Consequently, the petitioner’s counsel applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court accepted the application for withdrawal. Accordingly, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court should entertain the writ petition filed by the petitioner

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • court discretion
  • high court

Judgment

                                                                                      903-WP-704-2026 (CR).odt




                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                        CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                          WRIT PETITION NO. 704 OF 2026

                      Rajesh Shubhash Aatkire                                   ..… Petitioner

                                VERSUS

                      State of Maharashtra & Anr.                               ..… Respondents

                                                         ...
                      Adv. Niranjan Deepak Tiwari i/by Adv. A. S. Desai, Advocates for Petitioner.

                      Mrs. Priyanka S. Rane, APP for Respondent No. 1-State.
                                                         …

                                                       CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.
                                                       DATE  : SEPTEMBER 11, 2026
                      PER COURT :

                      1.           After hearing the learned Advocate for the Petitioner for some

                      time, when this Court expressed its disinclination to interfere with the prayer

                      made in the present Petition, at that time, on instructions, the learned

                      Advocate for the Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the present Petition. His

                      statement is accepted.

                      2.           In view of the above statement, the Petition is dismissed as

                      withdrawn.


TALLE
SHUBHAM
ASHOKRAO
Digitally signed by
                                                                         (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)
TALLE SHUBHAM
ASHOKRAO
Date: 2026.09.11
17:47:56 +0530



                      Shubham                                                                      Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.