Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ADITYA EDUCATION TRUST THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT SUBHASHCHANDRA MITTHULAL SARDA AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The High Court granted leave to withdraw the writ petition, resulting in its disposal as withdrawn.

Summary

The Aditya Education Trust, represented by its President Subhashchandra Mitthulal Sarda, filed a writ petition (903 WR 7128 of 2015) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel N. B. Bhosale (on behalf of V. D. Salunke), submitted a written request on 09/09/2026 seeking leave to withdraw the petition. The Court examined the request and considered whether it could grant permission for withdrawal. The Bench, comprising Justices Kishore C. Sant and Jitendra Jain, granted the petitioner's request. Consequently, the writ petition was formally disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedure for a petitioner to withdraw a writ petition before the High Court?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • procedural law
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                            (1)                 903-WP-7128-2015




                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                            BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                        903 WRIT PETITION NO. 7128 OF 2015

Aditya Education Trust Through Its President Subhashchandra Mitthulal
                            Sarda And Another
                                 VERSUS
                  The State Of Maharashtra And Others
                                     ...
Mr. N. B. Bhosale h/f Mr. V. D. Salunke, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. R. S. Wani, AGP for Respondent-State.
                                       CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT &
                                                   JITENDRA JAIN, JJ.

                                       DATE       : 09th SEPTEMBER 2026.

PC :-

1.           Learned Advocate for the petitioner, on written instructions from

his client, seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition. The copy of written

communication dated 09/09/2026 is taken on record and marked “X”

for the purpose of identification.

2.           Leave granted as prayed for.

3.           Writ petition stands disposed off as withdrawn.



     [JITENDRA JAIN, J.]                           [KISHORE C. SANT, J.]
D.A.ETHAPE


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.