Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SUDHIR SUBHASH SONTAKKE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court held that the office objections must be removed within six weeks from the date of the order, failing which the petitions shall be dismissed.

Summary

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a series of writ petitions filed by various educational institutions and individuals against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitions raised procedural objections termed as "office objections" that were pending before the court. The court directed that these office objections must be removed within six weeks from the date of the order. If the objections are not removed within the stipulated period, the court ordered that the matters will stand dismissed without further reference. No substantive merits of the petitions were addressed in the order.

Issues considered

  • Whether the pending office objections in the writ petitions should be removed within a specified time
  • Consequences of non‑compliance with the court’s direction to remove objections

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • office objections
  • procedural compliance
  • high court
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                                        515.15wp&ors
                                  (1)

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
             BENCH AT AURANGABAD

               WRIT PETITION NO. 515 OF 2015

Ahilyadevi Holkar Shiksan
Prasarak Mandal                                   ..PETITIONER

      VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                   ..RESPONDENTS

Mr V.D. Salunke, Advocate for petitioner;
Mr S.P. Sonpawale, A.G.P. for respondent-State;
                             ….

               WRIT PETITION NO. 596 OF 2015

Ahmednagar District Certified
Auditors Service Association & Ors.               ..PETITIONERS

      VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                   ..RESPONDENTS

Mr A.V. Hon, Advocate for petitioners;
Mrs P.V.Diggikar, A.G.P. for respondent-State;
                             …..

               WRIT PETITION NO. 720 OF 2015

Dr. Babu Netaji More                              ..PETITIONER

      VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                   ..RESPONDENTS

Mr V.B. Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner;
Mr S.S. Dande, A.G.P. for respondent-State;
                               …..

               WRIT PETITION NO. 721 OF 2015

Dr Sudhir Subhash Sontakke & Ors.                 ..PETITIONERS

      VERSUS
                                                        515.15wp&ors
                                  (2)


The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                   ..RESPONDENTS

Mr V.B. Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioners;
Mr S.G. Sangle, A.G.P. for respondent-State;
                              …..

               WRIT PETITION NO. 722 OF 2015

Dr. Sanjay Prasad Biradar                         ..PETITIONER

      VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                   ..RESPONDENTS

Mr V.B. Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner;
Mrs M.A. Deshpande, A.G.P. for respondent-State;
                             ….

               WRIT PETITION NO. 723 OF 2015

Dr. Swati Gopalrao Pawar                          ..PETITIONER

      VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                   ..RESPONDENTS

Mr V.B. Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner;
Mr S.P. Sonpawale, A.G.P. for respondent-State;
                               ….

              WRIT PETITION NO. 1017 OF 2015

Dr Arun Sarangdhar Jirwankar                      ..PETITIONER

      VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                   ..RESPONDENTS

Mr V.B. Bagadia, Advocate for petitioners;
Mr K.N. Lokhande, A.G.P. for respondent-State;
                               ….

              WRIT PETITION NO. 1463 OF 2015

Rajeev Gandhi Sharirik Shikshan Mahavidyalaya
                                                    515.15wp&ors
                                  (3)

& Anr.                                        ..PETITIONERS

      VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.               ..RESPONDENTS


Mr G.A. Nagori, Advocate for petitioners;
Mrs P.V. Diggikar, A.G.P. for respondent-State;
                                …..
              WRIT PETITION NO. 9672 OF 2015

College of Physical Education                 ..PETITIONER

      VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.               ..RESPONDENTS


Mr B.R. Kedar, Advocate for petitioner;
Mrs P.V. Diggikar, A.G.P. for respondent-State;
                              ….
              WRIT PETITION NO. 1802 OF 2015

Chaturbhai Waljibhai Patel & Ors.             ..PETITIONERS

      VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.               ..RESPONDENTS

Mr V.D. Salunkar,Advocate for petitioners;
Mr S.S. Dande, A.G.P. for respondent-State;
                              ..…

                                CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE
                                            AND
                                        ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

                                 DATE : 19th NOVEMBER, 2019

ORAL ORDER:



            Office objections be removed within six weeks from
                                                          515.15wp&ors
                                  (4)

today, failing which, the matters shall stand dismissed without further

reference to the Court.




  (ANIL S. KILOR, J.)                   (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)

sjk


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.