Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

LAXMAN SHANKAR GAIKWADversusBHAUSAHEB HIRAMAN MOKALE AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court granted leave to withdraw and disposed the writ petition as withdrawn.

Summary

Laxman Shankar Gaikwad filed Writ Petition No. 722 of 2023 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the respondents. During the proceedings, the petitioner communicated to his counsel, Mr. N. S. Muthiyan, that he no longer wished to pursue the petition. The counsel filed a request before the court seeking leave to withdraw the petition. The bench, after noting the written instruction, granted leave to withdraw and ordered the petition to stand disposed as withdrawn. Consequently, any pending civil applications related to the petition were also disposed.

Issues considered

  • The petitioner’s request to withdraw the writ petition

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:40223

                                                 (1)                        925 WP 722 OF 2023


                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                               925 WRIT PETITION NO. 722 OF 2023

                                   LAXMAN SHANKAR GAIKWAD
                                                VERSUS
                          BHAUSAHEB HIRAMAN MOKALE AND OTHERS
                                                   ...
           Mr. N. S. Muthiyan, Advocate for the Petitioner
           Mr. Pradip S. Jadhav h/f. Mr. V. P. Latange, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3
                                                   …
                                              CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
                                            DATE        : 02.09.2026

           PER COURT :-

           .           Written instructions from the petitioner are placed on record by
           Mr. N. S. Muthiyan, learned Advocate for the petitioner whereby the petitioner
           has intimated him that he does not want to prosecute the Writ Petition further.
           The said communication is taken on record and marked as “X” for
           identification. The documents shall remain part of the record of the present
           proceedings.

           2.          In view of the written instructions, Mr. Muthiyan, learned
           Advocate for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition.

           3.          Leave granted.

           4.          The Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.

           5.          Civil Applications, if any, stand disposed of.



                                                              [AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.]
           PRW


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.