Bombay High Court
ADITYA ARUN BHOSAREKARversusPRIYANKA ADITYA BHOSAREKAR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary
Petitioner Aditya Arun Bhosarekar filed a writ petition against Respondent Priyanka Aditya Bhosarekar in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, later sought leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the petitioner's submission and ordered the petition to be disposed of as withdrawn. While the petition was withdrawn, the Court noted that all of the petitioner's substantive contentions remain open for future reference. Additionally, any pending applications related to the petition were also disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may withdraw the writ petition at the stage of proceedings
Subjects
- withdrawal of petition
- civil procedure
- writ petition
Judgment
10-WP-7228-2026 (C).doc
N.S.Kamble
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 7228 OF 2026
Aditya Arun Bhosarekar ...Petitioner
VERSUS
Priyanka Aditya Bhosarekar ...Respondent
Digitally signed _________________________________________________________________
NILAM by NILAM
SANTOSH
SANTOSH KAMBLE
KAMBLE Date: 2026.10.07
11:36:07 +0530
Mr.Cirish B. Badiger, for the Petitioner. (Through VC).
Mr.Vignesh Ashokan i/b Mr.Ravi Jadhav, for the Respondent.
Ms.Rutuja R. Khape, PSI, Khadki Police Station, Pune City.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 06th OCTOBER 2026
P.C. :
. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for
the Respondent.
2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks
leave to withdraw the Petition.
3. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the Petitioner,
the Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
4. All contentions of the Petitioners are kept open.
5. All pending Applications are disposed of.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.